Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Dentons Canada Insurance Law Review

Updates on key developments in Canadian insurance law by a national team of experienced lawyers.

open menu close menu

Dentons Canada Insurance Law Review

  • Home
  • About us

DCPD coverage is introduced to Alberta’s standard auto policy

By Wendy N. Moody
July 10, 2021
  • Insurance
  • Insurance regulatory
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Introduction

The Alberta Government has introduced changes to the Standard Owner’s Automobile Insurance Policy (SPF-1), effective January 1, 2022.  The amendments incorporate language that is more consistent with other sections in the SPF-1, as well as the other Standard Policy Forms. More specifically, most changes focus on the upcoming advent of Direct Compensation for Property Damage (DCPD) coverage in Alberta.

The changes to the SPF-1 follow the making of the Direct Compensation for Property Damage Regulation, Alta Reg 132/2021 (DCPDR), and the Miscellaneous Insurance Provisions Amendment Regulation, OC 181/2021, both of which will come into force on January 1, 2022, alongside section 585.1 of the Insurance Act, RSA 2000, c I-3 (the Act), which was recently introduced in Bill 41. The DCPDR sets out in great detail how insurer’s must determine the degree of fault of the insured for the loss of use or damage described in section 585.1 of the Act, which will form the equivalent of the Driver’s Fault Chart used in Quebec and the Fault Determination Rules used in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario and Prince Edward Island. The DCPDR also provides particulars relating to voluntary payments, prescribed classes of contracts and permitted indemnification.

Why section A.1 was included

Section A.1 was added to the SPF-1 to address the potential application of DCPD coverage. DCPD coverage allows insured drivers to be compensated by their own insurer for property damage resulting from an automobile collision, to the extent they were not at fault in the accident. Similar to Ontario, the new Section A.1 expressly confirms that insured’s are not permitted to sue anyone, including an at-fault motorist, to recover their DCPD deductible.

Under Schedule C, to clarify the interaction between DCPD coverage and Section C deductibles, the SPF-1 now states:

Where an occurrence causing loss or damage is covered under any subsection of Section C and Section A.1, the deductible under Section C will be the deductible stated in the applicable subsection of Section C of Item 4 of the Policy or in the Certificate of Automobile Insurance multiplied by the percentage to which the driver of the automobile was determined at-fault for the accident under the regulations. 

The express exclusions of Section C coverage have been expanded to include instances where an insured drives or operates the automobile while in a condition for which the insured is convicted of an offence under section 130 of the National Defence Act, RSC 1985, c N-5, or contravenes section 88.1(1) of the Traffic Safety Act, RSA 2000, c T-6. This amendment reflects the Alberta Superintendent of Insurance’s determination that these instances are equivalent to Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, impaired convictions.

The definition of “the automobile” has been expanded for the purposes of Section A.1 to include personal utility trailers with a gross vehicle weight rating of 910 kilograms or less, that are not used for temporary or permanent accommodations. The intention of the drafters was to include personal utility trailers that, in accordance with Alberta Transportation, do not require trailer brakes. Additionally, any trailer would be included in the definition if it is described in a Policy or Certificate of Automobile Insurance that provides for DCPD coverage. Section 6 of the General Provisions has been amended to clarify that separate deductibles will apply to a trailer and automobile under Section A.1 coverage if the trailer is specifically listed with an applicable deductible.

General amendments

The amendments have removed outdated language, including reference to “the application”, which has been replaced with more specific reference to the Policy and the Certificate of Automobile Insurance (the Certificate). The Certificate is referenced separately as it is not part of the Policy, but rather a representation of the Policy. References to the particular policy contract have also been amended for consistency by capitalizing “Policy.”

Where indemnity is provided under subsections 1, 3 or 4 of Section C, following a theft of the entire automobile, the maximum reimbursement for the rental of a substitute automobile was previously capped at $750 and the recent amendments increase this cap to $900, which adjustment was made to reflect inflation.

Conclusion

As the amendments to the SPF-1 are primarily aimed at addressing the introduction of DCPD coverage in Alberta, much of their impact will rely upon the interpretation and application of the DCPDR and section 585.1 of the Act, which both come into force on January 1, 2022. This is expected to be a developing area, possibly following those other provinces who have previously introduced DCPD coverage.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Wendy N. Moody

About Wendy N. Moody

Wendy is a member of Dentons Litigation and Dispute Resolution team. She practices in the area of litigation with a specific focus on insurance litigation. Her practice includes motor vehicle claims, subrogation recovery, occupiers’ liability claims, and life and disability matters. Wendy also has experience in commercial matters. She has appeared before the Court of Queen’s Bench and Provincial Court of Alberta. Wendy has also effectively resolved many cases through private mediation.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Insurance
  • Insurance regulatory

OSFI Releases the Final Version of its Climate Risk Management Guideline: Actions for Federally Regulated Insurers

By Laurie LaPalme, Derek Levinsky, and Jesse Collins-Swartz
  • Insurance

When a duty to defend application cannot be determined summarily

By Sara E. Hart
  • Insurance

Bill 96: Important Trademark Law Changes Impacting the use of Non-French Language Trademarks in Quebec

By Laurie LaPalme, Derek Levinsky, Panagiota Dafniotis, and Jesse Collins-Swartz

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

  • Automobile
  • Construction and Design
  • Coverage
  • D&O and E&O Insurance
  • Environmental
  • General
  • Insurance
  • Insurance regulatory
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Misc.
  • Securities/Class Actions
  • Tort Liability
Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site