Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canada Insurance Law Review

Updates on key developments in Canadian insurance law by a national team of experienced lawyers.

open menu close menu

Canada Insurance Law Review

  • Home
  • About us

The Supreme Court of British Columbia clarifies the scope of social host liability in McCormick vs Plambeck

By Meghan Bell
October 13, 2020
  • General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The British Columbia Supreme Court recently clarified the scope of social host liability in McCormick v. Plambeck, [2020] BCSC 881 (McCormick). The Court dismissed the
Plaintiff’s claim of a finding of social host liability on the basis that no duty of care was established on the facts.

In the early morning of September 16, 2012, the 17-year-old Plaintiff, Calder McCormick (McCormick) and the defendant Ryan Plambeck (Plambeck) attended a party at the home of the defendants Stephen Patrick Pearson and Lidia Diana Pearson (the Pearsons), located on Salt Spring Island. Alcohol and marijuana were consumed by minors at the party. They both had arrived to the party on foot.

The Pearsons had in place a rule that drinking and driving would not be permitted and had a number of mechanisms in place to minimize the risk of harm. The hosts had set out a bowl in which to place car keys that were collected. Sporadically, the Pearsons checked in on the party. The party was set to end at 1:00 am. At the end of the party, the Pearsons made efforts to ascertain the attendees who did not have a ride. Once they were identified, they coordinated driving them home or making phone calls for rides. Some of the attendees also stayed the night.

The Plaintiff and Plambeck left the party on foot. The Court determined based on the evidence, Plambeck was not exhibiting any signs of intoxication when he left the party. Also, the Plaintiff had consumed less than six beers. After leaving the Pearsons, Plambeck proceeded to steal a vehicle from one of the Pearsons’ neighbours. The Plaintiff got in the vehicle with him. Plambeck was unlicenced and uninsured. They were subsequently involved in a car accident resulting in Plambeck’s death and the Plaintiff, a passenger in the vehicle, sustained serious injuries.

Ultimately, the Honourable Chief Justice Hinkson found that, although it was common for the Salt Spring Island community to leave their cars unlocked with the keys in, the accident was not a foreseeable event. The Court found there was nothing to indicate the Plaintiff would suffer harm in the circumstances he left the party. It was unforeseeable Plambeck would steal a car and subsequently become involved in a car accident. The Court found that the Pearsons had taken reasonable steps to minimize the risk of drunk driving at the party.

In considering whether the relationship between the Plaintiff and the defendants disclosed reasonable foreseeability and sufficient proximity to establish a prima facie duty of care, the court held that even though something was possible does not mean it would be reasonably foreseeable. 

The Court noted that the post-Childs jurisprudence (in reference to the Supreme Court of Canada seminal social host liability case, Childs v Desormeaux, [2006] SCC 18) had focused heavily on a social host’s knowledge as to the relevant guest’s level of intoxication but rejected the submission that the Plaintiff was intoxicated when he left the party and was incapable of responsible conduct. In the result, there were no obvious signs that the Plaintiff would suffer injury by walking home from the party.

The risk of vehicle theft was found to be too remote to create a duty on the Pearsons to anticipate that guests from their party would steal a vehicle to drive after drinking alcohol.

Although the court found that the Pearsons were in a paternalistic relationship with the guests of the party, no duty of care had been established in the case because the injury complained of was not reasonably foreseeable as a result of the defendants’ conduct.

Takeaway

Social hosts need to ensure they have acted reasonably in the circumstances and must take reasonable steps to minimize the risk of harm to their guests under the circumstances to avoid liability. An analysis of whether a duty of care exists for social hosts will be highly fact-dependent. 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
duty of care, social host
Meghan Bell

About Meghan Bell

Meghan Bell is an associate in our Litigation and Dispute Resolution group based in Edmonton. She has a varied litigation practice that includes corporate, commercial and civil litigation matters. Meghan has appeared before the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, the Provincial Court of British Columbia, the British Columbia Supreme Court, as well as various administrative tribunals. She has assisted with trials and judicial reviews, and is experienced at resolving disputes through negotiation and mediation.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Automobile
  • Coverage

Sole proprietors and entitlement to Section B loss of income disability benefits in Alberta: the important distinction between profit and revenue

By Robert Gilroy
  • Automobile

Alberta Court’s application of a “priority flip” mechanism to a “loaner vehicle” from a dealership

By Lovin Narula
  • General
  • Insurance
  • Mergers and Acquisitions

Disruption in Canada’s insurance market podcast

By Laurie LaPalme and Arthur L. Hamilton

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

  • Automobile
  • Construction and Design
  • Coverage
  • D&O and E&O Insurance
  • Environmental
  • General
  • Insurance
  • Insurance regulatory
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Misc.
  • Securities/Class Actions
  • Tort Liability
Dentons logo white

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site