Laurie LaPalme, Author at Dentons Canada Insurance Law Review - Page 4 of 4

Dentons Canada Insurance Law Review

Updates on key developments in Canadian insurance law by a national team of experienced lawyers.

Federal government invokes the Emergencies Act: Implications for insurers in Canada

By Laurie LaPalme, Marisa Coggin, and Jesse Collins-Swartz

Insurance

The wait is over – Final reinsurance guidance issued by OSFI

By Laurie LaPalme, Marisa Coggin, and Derek Levinsky

Insurance regulatory

BCFSA launches public consultation process for Information Security incident reporting rules for financial institutions

By Laurie LaPalme, Marisa Coggin, and Jesse Collins-Swartz

Insurance regulatory

OSFI launches consultation process for Draft Guideline B-13: Technology and Cyber Risk Management

By Laurie LaPalme, Marisa Coggin, and Jesse Collins-Swartz

Insurance

OSFI issues final version of Guideline E-4 (Foreign Entities Operating in Canada on a Branch Basis)

By Laurie LaPalme, Marisa Coggin, and Jesse Collins-Swartz

Disruption in Canada’s insurance market podcast

By Laurie LaPalme and Arthur L. Hamilton

General

Issuance of restricted licences discontinued by the Insurance Council of British Columbia

By Laurie LaPalme, Marisa Coggin, and Katie-May O'Donnell

Bill C-31: The expanding role of the Defence Investment Agency

Canada is entering a new era of defence, security and industrial investment. Budget 2025: Canada Strong, with the establishment of the Defence Investment Agency and an allocation of CA$81 billion [...]

Global data privacy and AI case law review – June 2026

Global: Welcome to the June edition of Dentons' global data privacy and AI case law review. This update contains submissions from Dentons colleagues across the world, from the UK and [...]

Fairness in construction contracts: Understanding the prevention principle after <em>CIMIC Morningstar Investments Ltd. v. Chandos Construction Ltd.</em>

Canada: Broadly, the prevention principle is a contractual doctrine that bars a party from enforcing an obligation where that party's own conduct brought about the other side's failure to perform. [...]