Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Canada Insurance Law Review

Updates on key developments in Canadian insurance law by a national team of experienced lawyers.

open menu close menu

Canada Insurance Law Review

  • Home
  • About us

Recent changes to the Alberta insurance regime

By Omolara Oladipo
November 24, 2020
  • Automobile
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Introduction

Practitioners are likely aware of the work of the Alberta Automobile Insurance Advisory Committee (AAIAC) and the attendant uproar regarding the proposed “no-fault” insurance model. Many people weighed in, and in March 2020, on behalf of practitioners, the Alberta Branch of the Canadian Bar Association initially weighed in on the process. They expressed concern regarding the process of the review of the insurance regime, as well as the need to balance the issue of claim cost and fairness.

In October, the AAIAC released a 536-page report concluding that injury settlements and litigation costs are responsible for escalating auto insurance premiums in Alberta, and it recommended that victims of auto collisions would be better off under a no-fault system where an independent traffic injury regulator settles their claims. While the province has advised it is not ready to take the huge steps recommended prior to further consultation, it has introduced draft legislation to address some of the AAIAC recommendations.

The newly announced Bill 41, the Insurance (Enhancing Driver Affordability and Care) Amendment Act, was expected to introduce a no-fault regime but has not done so… yet. This is a quick primer regarding the changes anticipated to the insurance regime as soon as they come into force.

The Alberta Legislative Assembly tabled Bill41on October 29, 2020, and it passed second reading on November 18, 2020.

Recent changes

The following substantive changes to the Insurance Act, R.S.A. 2000 c. I-3 are important regarding personal injury damages:

  1. Unless with leave of court or otherwise agreed upon by all parties, Bill 41 limits the number of damages experts to be called by limiting claims under $100,000 to one expert and report (from the same expert). For claims above $100,000, reports from experts are limited to a maximum of three experts on the injury damages. Additionally, parties may rely on a joint expert report.

The party seeking leave to call additional experts must provide the name and scope of expertise of any proposed additional expert, as well as records supporting the need for additional evidence.

  • Two big changes are now in place regarding prejudgment interest:
  • As opposed to the date of a motor vehicle accident, the new act limitsthe start date for prejudgment interest on non-pecuniary damages to the earlier of the date the plaintiff serves the defendant(s) with the claim and the date the plaintiff provides the defendant’s insurer with written notice of the claim.
  • Bill 41 changes start date for prejudgment interest on non-pecuniary damages. Specifically, interest will only accrue from the earlier of the date the plaintiff serves the claim and the date the plaintiff provides the defendant’s insurer with a written notice of the claim – as opposed to the date of the subject accident.
  • Bill 41 also changes the interest rates for non-pecuniary for loss or damages as they will henceforth be calculated at the same rate as the prescribed interest rate on pecuniary damages.
  • In addition to the foregoing, Bill 41 provides for direct compensation by an insurer for property damage in an accident involving more than one insured vehicle that are owned by different persons.

On a related note, by Order-in-Council 332/2020 of October 30, 2020, the Lieutenant Governor in Council amended the Diagnostic and Treatment Protocols Regulation (AR 116/2014) to provide:

  • a $1,000 cap on the aggregate expenses payable or recoverable under the protocols in relation to adjunct therapy (i.e., therapy received from one or more of a dentist, an occupational therapist or a psychologist);
  • that visits to adjunct therapists do not count towards the combined total of physical therapy, chiropractic and adjunct therapy visits permitted under the protocols; and
  • an in-person visit to a health care practitioner or another person authorized to provide treatment under protocols constitutes a single visit, irrespective of the number of injuries treated during the visit.

By Order-in-Council 333/2020 of October 30, 2020, the Lieutenant Governor in Council amended the Minor Injury Regulation (AR 123/2004) to extend the definition of:

  • a “certified examiner” to include a dentist; and
  • a minor injury to include a sprain, strain or WAD injury “caused by the accident that does not result in a serious impairment and includes, in respect of a sprain, strain or WAD injury that occurs on or after November 1, 2020, any clinically associated sequelae of the sprain, strain or WAD injury, whether physical or psychological in nature, caused by the accident that do not result in a serious impairment”.

Personal injury practitioners should keep an eye out for more changes as it is apparent this is not the end of changes to the insurance regime in Alberta. 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
AAIAC, Auto insurance, premiums
Omolara Oladipo

About Omolara Oladipo

Omolara is a seasoned lawyer who has moved jurisdictions to practice law in Canada. She is in one of the firm’s Litigation Groups and carries on an administrative law, environmental law and general litigation practice. In Canada, she has assisted clients on a wide variety of matters and has appeared before all levels of Court in Alberta as well as administrative tribunals.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Automobile
  • Coverage

Sole proprietors and entitlement to Section B loss of income disability benefits in Alberta: the important distinction between profit and revenue

By Robert Gilroy
  • Automobile

Alberta Court’s application of a “priority flip” mechanism to a “loaner vehicle” from a dealership

By Lovin Narula
  • Automobile

Who is driving your vehicle? Vicarious liability for unidentified drivers

By Brian Catalano

About Dentons

Dentons is the world’s largest law firm, delivering quality and value to clients around the globe. Dentons is a leader on the Acritas Global Elite Brand Index, a BTI Client Service 30 Award winner and recognized by prominent business and legal publications for its innovations in client service, including founding Nextlaw Labs and the Nextlaw Global Referral Network. Dentons’ polycentric approach and world-class talent challenge the status quo to advance client interests in the communities in which we live and work. www.dentons.com.

Dentons Global Elite Law Firm

Twitter

Categories

  • Automobile
  • Construction and Design
  • Coverage
  • D&O and E&O Insurance
  • Environmental
  • General
  • Misc.
  • Securities/Class Actions
  • Tort Liability
Dentons logo white

© 2021 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site